Blueprint for Better Refereeing, Part 4
Friday, 28 November 2008

If you've been reading this series so far, you'll probably have picked up an anti-referee vibe from me. You'd be right.
In parts 1,2 and 3, referees have been given a bit of a hard time. But improving the system isn't a one-way street, so we need to effectively protect and train our referees. That's what part 4 is all about: treatment of referees by players, the Panel proposed in previous posts, and the authorities.
Thing is, I slag off referees more than most. But they're not bad guys, they're not cheats (Chris Foy excepted, natch). They're just...well they're a bit crap. So let's help them.
I think it's important that football continues to push respect (notice the lower-case 'r') for referees, but the FA and Premier League need to understand that respect is earned, not given away for free - and our referees simply do not deserve to be excused the horrific errors they make every single weekend.
The Respect campaign was doomed from the start for that very reason (ain't hindsight wonderful). In fact it's made supporters (and probably players) resent referees more. After all, there's nothing quite so sick-making as a man who starts talking about respect having done nothing to earn it.
The game review discussed in the last post from this series should be the first step in improving refereeing quality in English football. The findings should be fed back to referees directly after every single match, providing a detailed but - and this is most important - constructive assessment.
Constructively advising referees must surely be preferable to the kind of public flogging we've seen handed out to Mark Halsey and Stuart Attwell this season.
Training of referees appears to be lacking, based on the quality of our so-called professionals. So it's time we provided better training (and continue good practice where it already exists). When referees are of decent quality and cut out the obvious errors, they can begin to demand respect from football players. Those players are highly-paid, dedicated and supremely talented individuals. The referees are, currently, only highly-paid.
Here's the potentially controversial bit: I think Premier League-specific training should be provided to all those referees eligible to take charge of top flight matches. It's very important that referees can deal with the different surroundings, which means they should be trained in dealing with superstars (i.e. remaining neutral, level-headed and unbiased throughout games), and what I'll call manager management: ignoring blatant attempts to skew the playing field by talking in the week before a match about how hard-done-by their team is, not being intimidated, and being aware that complaining managers are simply playing the odds.
Extra regulations should be brought in to aid the improvement of referees' reputations. The most important of these would be the banning of referees discussing specific decisions with the media. Halsey began this by explaining a decision a few years back, and it is now commonplace for referees to explain themselves. This must stop, and that would help to kill the 'story' in the press about a decision.
It would also keep the argument about 'which decision' was made in-house so that it can be discussed sensibly. After controversial decisions, referees are often quick to make up or misappropriate rules in order to excuse their errors. It's not on.
So that's part 4. I'd be interested in your views.
Read more

























