
According to several media outlets, the Premier League
"is considering a four-team play-off to decide who takes the fourth Champions League qualification slot". From what I gather, the playoffs would be very similar to the Football League's promotion playoffs. The team finishing fourth would presumably play the team finishing seventh, and fifth would play sixth.
The rationale, of course, is that the stranglehold of the traditional 'top four' - Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United - is unbreakable, boring, predictable and ultimately very damaging to both the Premier League and wider English football. With the Premier League becoming dull and clubs spending themselves into oblivion, there seems to be a paradigm shift among supporters and the media. Both now appear willing to say "enough is enough" when it comes to football's impending implosion.
The aforementioned 'top four' have of course voiced their opposition to the proposal shared with them earlier this month, proving that Premier League football clubs are nothing but money-hungry, self-serving businesses. So much for the working class game.
There is precedent for this approach. In Holland, a similar concept was trialled but has now been abandoned. Cynical supporters might argue that it was brought in to rescue an ailing powerhouse, a possibility which cannot be discounted in any discussion about the Premier League's proposal. In an ideal world, the Champions League would be for champions. But that's not realistic in the modern game, so is this new proposal a hit or a miss from the Premier League?
The case forIt's important to acknowledge that the status quo is not acceptable anymore. The Premier League's rationale is, for once, sound. The traditional 'top four' have been the beneficiaries of a shambolic system which has allowed pound after pound after pound to flood their way, making them ever more powerful. Not that they've been particularly wise with their finances, but that's another post altogether. The fact of the matter is that the Champions League places in the Premier League have become a closed shop. That's why the Premier League is as dull as dishwater, and that's why so many of us are fast losing interest.
Change is no longer optional.
The potential result of opening up the last Champions League spot in the Premier League is a more exciting division - simple as that. The 'big four', especially Liverpool and Arsenal, would be drawn into battles on two fronts. At the top, the title race should be made more interesting by the necessity for four teams to fight for the top three spots. Below that, Manchester City, Tottenham Hotspur, Aston Villa and any number of other clubs would be trying to secure playoff spots and play their way into the Champions League through the new route. The crossfire in the title race might even - whisper it - open up third place. A more exciting Premier League is not only desirable; it's becoming essential.
And the more regularly one of the current 'big four' fails to qualify, the more unstable the cabal becomes. Again, that can only be a good thing for the competitivenss of the division. Sure, the big boys might not have budgeted for this eventuality and it could be disastrous. More fool them.
Let's not underestimate the possibilities. Liverpool, for example, dropping out one year could have more effect than we might expect. It could break the influence of 'top four'. Refereeing decisions might slowly become impartial again. Injury time might be applied correctly. "Big name" players will find it more difficult to effectively referee matches. This crap is ruining the game and anything that gives it a kick in the knackers is surely worth a try.
The introduction of playoffs also means there will be a playoff final - and what an occasion that will be! Personally, I'm not necessarily against the Premier League having a glitzy showcase match at the end of the season (as long as it doesn't decide the title winners). And for me, the argument that this is just a scheme to create another money-spinner for Wembley stadium, which we all know is desperate for cash, doesn't wash. Wembley's accounts are not really the Premier League's concern.
The case againstSo, the downside. The clubs aiming to take advantage of the new system - the likes of Spurs and Villa - would face a potential dilemma. Steady building is always advisable in the top flight, but the sudden opening of a door will certainly appeal to the game's short-termism. The temptation will be profound, and the opportunity to jump in two-footed to this new space would not be one the clubs would like to miss. Manchester City, of course, probably don't need to be too concerned about this - but others most definitely do. Gambling on the future has been hugely damaging for more than a handful of clubs now, and it has to stop.
One of the major problems is that finishing fourth - or winning the forthcoming playoffs - doesn't
actually earn much. "Champions League qualification" is, in fact, anything but. It's just the right to attempt to qualify. So in reality the playoffs could (would?) see a team go through the drama of scraping into seventh on three wheels, overcoming the fourth placed team, winning a high-octane final at Wembley, and then being knocked out of the Champions League in August. What's the point? As anti-climaxes go, this one would be above average.
In fact, that scenario raises another concern. Traditionalists like myself would argue that the European Cup should be for the champions only. What on
earth would be the point of a top-end mid-table club being knocked out in the CL qualifiers? Chatting to Luke from
The Football Ramble last week, we touched upon UEFA's missed opportunity. The Champions League might well be a lucrative competition, but the Europa League is the UEFA Cup's dying offspring.
The solution? Bring back the UEFA Cup in its knockout format and re-introduce the Cup Winners' Cup. They were fantastic competitions and would be a far more prosperous duo than the limp-wristed and universally disrespected Europa League. The Champions League could regain some of the European Cup's integrity. I think that a well-managed UEFA Cup could cover any loss of profit incurred by streamlining the Champions League. Allowing clubs that might well have finished outside the traditional UEFA Cup slots to compete in the Champions League would be borderline stupidity.
I've also heard people questioning the motivation behind this proposal. It's a little bit "grassy knoll" but it's a valid consideration nonetheless. Isn't this just to protect the 'big four', so the argument goes, from Manchester City and their bottomless pit of money? It's the flipside of the assumed reasoning: if Liverpool or Arsenal, for example,
fail to finish in the top four, this is their safety net. I like this argument, I admire it's cloak-and-dagger suspiciousness. But surely Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United aren't just opposing all this as part of their master disguise?
The TFT alternativeTruth be told, I haven't really considered the possibility of introducing playoffs into the Champions League race. As I've mentioned, I want a return to the impossible integrity of Champions meaning champions. However, this proposal has got me thinking and I think I've worked out how to take the benefit of the case for and nullify much of the case against: a one-off match. Opening the race up to one extra team would still make the league more exciting, but not allow the ludicrous possibility of a seventh-placed team playing in the Champions League.
So, fourth plays fifth at Wembley in a fight to the death. 90 minutes, extra time and penalties. One Saturday afternoon in May, one chance to upset the apple cart. I think that's a happy medium that ticks the right boxes and ignores the wrong ones.
And another alternative...I first read about this proposal at
VillaTalk.com and one of the members there proposed an even more radical alternative, but one which undoubtedly has definite merit. I'll give you the problems first. The Premier League is boring, largely because of the Champions League cabal. The Europa League is rubbish. And the League Cup, and to a certain extent the FA Cup, aren't what they used to be. So 'Gringo' has come up with the bright idea of solving all these problems in one. The end of season playoffs would feature the fourth- and fifth-placed Premier League teams and the winners of the two Cups.
The winner of that series goes on to play in the Champions League. It's not a bad idea, but my main concern would be the complications arising when one or both of those competitions are won by a top three club. Do the runners-up go in? (Millwall in the Champions League?!) If not, we're back at square one with the seventh-placed club having a shot at the big time. Give me a one-off match between fourth and fifth any day.
What do you think of this new proposal? Is there a better way? Is it even needed? Over to you...
(Pic via
BBC News)
Read more